Joseph’s speech also put ‘quality’ onto the education

[sujonkumar6300]

This was evident in Joseph’s speech, where claims that state education was dominated by gangs and run by hypocritical social experimenters were foregrounded (a reference to the William Tyndale controversy). Such arguments are likely to be highly persuasive precisely because they are based on ethos and pathos, rather than logos.

Policy agenda. Hiss key argument was that equality had to be replaced with ‘quality’ and an agenda of ‘choice and diversity’ in place of an agenda which he saw as promoting austria consumer email list self-evidently low-quality comprehensive schools and progressive teaching methods.

‘The argument for “quality” has become highly influential across the political spectrum. It is sufficiently flexible to fit into various ideological positions.’

This argument for ‘quality’ has become highly influential across the political spectrum. It is sufficiently flexible to fit into various ideological positions. In the 1990s, it enabled John Major to remonstrate against educational inequality, saying that he was not prepared to see children in some parts of the country have a ‘second-class education’. Later on in the decade and into the new century, it enabled Tony Blair and the Conservative-led coalition government to decry ‘bog standard’ comprehensive schools and ‘educational apartheid’.