The true value is never obtained with certainty.

[mahbubamim077]

In this last hypothesis, the distinguished master concludes that no crime can be recognized. However, in the present case, nothing of the sort was proven: neither intentional falsehood nor inaccuracy . In the answer to the previous question, the matter was clarified. The judge himself, in the sentence, stated that it was not important to inquire into the moral element of the crime. Therefore, no intentional falsehood was recognized.

22. Let us examine the fifth question:

“Coffee purchase and sale contracts, with prices being invoiced sms gateway brunei only upon arrival of the merchandise in Santos, are made by correspondence. The merchant, by duly confirmed letter, buys a coffee, to be paid for upon its arrival. Then, with the receipts in his possession, he resells, by letter, also confirmed, this coffee, at a profit, the buyer being obliged to pay this new price (in which the profit is included) upon arrival of the coffee and upon invoice at that time.

Does this profit, resulting from the higher price obtained upon resale, being obtained in a given fiscal year, constitute profit for that fiscal year and can it be incorporated into the balance sheet for that fiscal year, in order to influence the distribution of profits? Or can it only be considered profit for the immediate fiscal year, if only in that immediate fiscal year is the profit determined in cash? If the transaction is proven by letter and concluded with a reputable signature, does its profit actually represent profit for the year in which the transaction is carried out?”