Can we use this standard for functional modeling

[jarinislamfatema]

And in general, standards cannot be said to be old because they do not lose their properties over time. A standard is not a car or a cow, it is essentially an idea, it cannot become heavier or lighter, it cannot develop physiological or technological shortcomings. Ideas and standards become obsolete only when something appears that disproves them. For IDEF0, such a disprove does not exist; it remains correct and relevant today. 2. Outdated and does not perform its functions Here let's look at what functions the IDEF0 standard performs. IDEF0 is intended specifically for functional modeling.

Yes, we can. Could we use it when it came out? We list of ukraine whatsapp phone numbers could. Will we be able to use it in 10 years? Yes, we can. Accordingly, this standard has not lost its functionality and, from this point of view, is also not outdated. 3.Something new came out. Outdated compared to the other To better understand, let's look at an example with cars. The first Fords were produced at the beginning of the 20th century. Can we say that the first Ford cars are outdated? Yes, because newer models have come out that do not have the same shortcomings that the first models had, and also have certain advantages compared to them.

This is already a more developed, progressive model. Accordingly, what was before it is an outdated version of what we have now. Can we say that IDEF0 has any analogues, development, other systems that more successfully solve the problems that IDEF0 faces as a standard of functional modeling? No, we cannot say so. Relevance of IDEF0 Any tool must be considered from the point of view of the tasks it solves. Achieving results. If you solve the tasks assigned to you with the help of this tool, it cannot become obsolete for you as long as it helps solve the task.