The advantages of the traditional
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2025 10:49 am
Traditional methods of protecting information inside a data center are quite straightforward. Increased traffic means you need to install a more powerful server responsible for ensuring its information security without slowing down the flow of legitimate packets. For example, Huawei has a USG9500 solution that can “grind” traffic at a speed of almost 2 Tbit/s.
approach are quite obvious: the data center architecture remains familiar; data is controlled by a reliable, proven method. AliExpress, Tencent, many telecom operators and other large traffic generators are quite satisfied with how information security is provided in their data centers using the familiar method.
But the downsides of the traditional approach to information security at the data center level are also obvious. Solutions like the USG9500 are too expensive; they require quite substantial investments at the initial stage and take a long time to pay off - if we are talking about a business that is less profitable than AliExpress.
Moreover, very often a business owner, when italy mobile database his investments, cannot accurately predict the initial volume of traffic for his project and, most importantly, the rate of its growth. But this fundamentally determines what hardware capacity will be needed to process such traffic in just a year or two: 20, 40, 60 Gbit/s? Another disadvantage of placing such projects in traditional data centers is that even if it is possible to expand the hardware capacity some time later, this expansion will have to be done "live", which is fraught with many minor incidents with far-reaching consequences for the business of the data center owner himself.
approach are quite obvious: the data center architecture remains familiar; data is controlled by a reliable, proven method. AliExpress, Tencent, many telecom operators and other large traffic generators are quite satisfied with how information security is provided in their data centers using the familiar method.
But the downsides of the traditional approach to information security at the data center level are also obvious. Solutions like the USG9500 are too expensive; they require quite substantial investments at the initial stage and take a long time to pay off - if we are talking about a business that is less profitable than AliExpress.
Moreover, very often a business owner, when italy mobile database his investments, cannot accurately predict the initial volume of traffic for his project and, most importantly, the rate of its growth. But this fundamentally determines what hardware capacity will be needed to process such traffic in just a year or two: 20, 40, 60 Gbit/s? Another disadvantage of placing such projects in traditional data centers is that even if it is possible to expand the hardware capacity some time later, this expansion will have to be done "live", which is fraught with many minor incidents with far-reaching consequences for the business of the data center owner himself.